CHAPTER 1
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Recognize that tests
are only tools.
- Explain why test
scores are fallible.
- Compare and contrast
testing and assessment.
- Explain why testing
and assessment skills are vital to today’s classroom teacher.
- Describe the recent
history of educational measurement.
- Identify the
implications of current trends in educational measurement for today’s
classroom teacher (i.e., IDEA-97, performance and portfolio assessment,
education reform and the global economy, high-stakes testing, teacher
competency testing, and increased involvement of professional associations).
CHAPTER 2
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Define high-stakes
testing.
- Describe the broad
impact high-stakes testing has on students, teachers, administrators,
schools, and the community.
- Explain the
implications of the “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2002 on high-stakes
testing.
- Describe the history
of high-stakes testing.
- Explain the
relationships among academic standards, performance standards, and alignment
in standard-based reform.
- Compare and contrast
criterion-referenced and norm-referenced high-stakes tests.
- Articulate the
arguments for and against high-stakes testing.
- Identify AERA’s 12
conditions that high-stakes testing programs should meet.
- Complete a checklist
to help determine whether a state’s high-stakes testing program is being
implemented according to AERA Conditions.
- Apply methods for
preparing themselves and their students for high-stakes tests.
CHAPTER 3
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe the main
purpose of testing.
- State the assumptions
underlying the use of tests to aid in educational decision-making.
- Identify the types of
educational decisions outlined in the text.
- Give examples of each
type of decision.
- Explain why regular
classroom teachers will now have to apply testing and measurement skills to
special education students.
- Associate various
types of decisions with the types of tests that provide data for these
decisions.
- Determine whether or
not a given test is appropriate for a given purpose.
- Describe the various
types of tests available, and identify situations in which they would be
appropriate.
- Discriminate among the
various types of tests and their appropriate uses.
CHAPTER 4
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Discriminate between
norm- and criterion-referenced tests.
- Describe why it is
necessary to decide on the type of information desired before deciding on
the type of test to administer.
- Identify the
advantages and disadvantages of norm- and criterion-referenced tests.
- Identify the reasons
why language and cultural sensitivity are important in administering and
interpreting tests.
- Explain why
specialized norm tables may be useful adjuncts to national norms when
interpreting results from diverse student populations.
- Define content
validity.
- Describe why content
validity evidence is important for classroom achievement tests.
- Describe the
three-stage classroom measurement model, and give examples of each stage.
- Describe why mastery
is less certain with norm-referenced tests than with criterion-referenced
tests.
- Describe the process
by which broad general goals become specific instructional objectives.
- Discriminate among
goals, program objectives, and instructional objectives.
- Discriminate between
specific instructional or behavioral objectives, and general or expressive
objectives.
- Describe how
instructional objectives can make a teacher’s job easier.
CHAPTER 5
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe the
components of a well-written instructional objective.
- Discriminate between
learning outcomes and learning activities.
- Discriminate between
observable and unobservable learning outcomes.
- Specify for an
instructional objective the conditions under which learning must be
demonstrated.
- Specify for an
instructional objective the criterion performance levels by which
performance is to be evaluated.
- Explain why test items
must match instructional objectives.
- Discriminate between
items that match and fail to match instructional objectives.
- Discriminate among
objectives written at different levels of the Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives – Cognitive Domain.
- Write objectives at
different levels of Taxonomy.
- Describe the
advantages of using a test blueprint for instructional planning and test
construction.
- Construct a test
blueprint for a given unit of instruction, according to the guidelines
provided.
CHAPTER 6
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Identify the type of
item format appropriate for different objectives.
- Discriminate between
well-written and poorly-written objective test items (true-false, matching,
multiple-choice, and completion).
- Correct the faults in
poorly-written objective items.
- Describe ways to
minimize the effects of guessing on true-false items.
- Recall suggestions for
writing true-false items.
- Describe ways to
minimize the effects of guessing on matching items.
- Recall suggestions for
writing matching items.
- Recognize item faults
specific to multiple-choice items.
- Suggest ways of
writing multiple-choice items at higher levels of cognitive complexity.
- Recall suggestions for
writing multiple-choice items.
- Explain why scoring
time is increased when completion items are employed.
- Recall suggestions for
writing completion items.
- Recall the advantages
and disadvantages for each item format.
- Write fault-free
objective test items that match their instructional objectives.
CHAPTER 7
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Define an essay item.
- Identify the types of
learning outcomes for which essays are best suited.
- Discriminate between
extended and restricted response essay items.
- Discriminate between
well-written and poorly-written essay items.
- Recall the advantages
and disadvantages of essay items.
- Explain why essay
items are difficult to score reliably.
- Identify situations in
which use of essay items is appropriate.
- Recall suggestions for
improving scoring reliability.
- Apply a detailed
scoring scheme, including scoring for content, process, and organization, to
an extended response essay item.
- Construct a complete
restricted response essay item including a content-oriented scoring scheme.
- Construct a complete
extended response essay item, including a detailed scoring scheme that
considers content, organization and process criteria.
- Recall suggestions for
facilitating assessment of knowledge organization in the classroom.
- Distinguish between
the assessment of knowledge organization and assessment of concepts.
- Identify opportunities
for using open-book questions and exams.
- Recall the guidelines
for planning an open-book exam.
CHAPTER 8
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe the four
steps involved in construction of a performance assessment.
- Describe the three
components of a good performance assessment.
- Describe the five
types of learner accomplishments that can be required to complete a
performance assessment.
- Suggest appropriate
ways to evaluate each of these five types of learner accomplishments.
- Describe a scoring
rubric.
- Develop a scoring
rubric.
- Define primary trait
scoring.
- Develop a primary
trait scoring scheme.
- Compare and contrast
rating scales and checklists regarding the types of performances each is
best/least suited for.
- Explain how holistic
scoring is used.
- Identify the primary
constraints that must be decided on when developing a performance measure.
- Compare and contrast
student portfolios with other performance assessment measures.
CHAPTER 9
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Articulate the
purposes for portfolio assessment.
- Identify the cognitive
skills that will be assessed by student portfolios.
- Identify the pitfalls
that can undermine the validity of portfolio assessment.
- Decide which products
to put in the portfolio and how many samples of each product to require.
- Prepare instructions
for students for how work gets turn in and returned.
- Construct the criteria
to use in judging the extent to which the purposes for portfolios are
achieved.
- Develop a procedure to
aggregate portfolio ratings into a single portfolio grade.
- Average portfolio
grades with other grades for an overall mark for the grading period.
- Plan a final
conference with learners and parents to discuss what the portfolio says
about the learner’s development and achievement.
- Complete a portfolio
development checklist to ensure the quality of the portfolio.
CHAPTER 10
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Explain why a positive
test-taking attitude is important.
- Discriminate between
quantitative and qualitative item analysis.
- Compute item
difficulty levels and discrimination indices.
- Identify
multiple-choice options in need of modification, given quantitative item
analysis data.
- Identify
multiple-choice items, likely to be ambiguous, miskeyed, or subject to
guessing, given quantitative item analysis data.
- Identify acceptable
ranges for item difficulty levels and discrimination indices.
- Explain why unmodified
norm-referenced item analysis procedures are inappropriate for
criterion-referenced tests.
- Compute quantitative
item analysis data for criterion-referenced tests using the modified
norm-referenced procedures described in the text.
- Interpret these data
to assess the appropriateness of criterion-referenced test items.
- Recall suggestions to
facilitate emotional detachment during test debriefing.
- Give examples of the
steps in the process of evaluating classroom achievement.
CHAPTER 11
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe the purpose
of a mark.
- Identify the single
most important factor to be included in a mark.
- Describe the problem
of mixing factors other than achievement into marks.
- Define and
discriminate among the five marking systems presented in the text.
- Identify the marking
system recommended by the authors and state the reasons for their
recommendations.
- Take a position in
defense of a different marking system, compare and contrast this system with
the one recommended by the authors, and support your position.
- Define and
discriminate among the different symbol systems presented in the text.
- Explain how checklists
can be a useful adjunct to letter or numerical symbol systems.
- Describe why simply
weighting component scores differentially may result in distortions of a
composite mark.
- Describe the procedure
suggested (i.e., equate before you weight) in the text to minimize the
likelihood that such distortions will affect final marks.
- Describe the front-end
and back-end equating procedures used to combine performance measures and
traditional measures into a single mark.
CHAPTER 12
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Explain why it is
necessary to organize test data.
- Compare and contrast
simple lists, simple frequency distributions, and grouped frequency
distributions.
- Recognize advantages
and limitations each approach to tabulating data.
- Identify the
appropriate number of intervals and interval width for a grouped frequency
distribution.
- Compare and contrast
histograms, frequency polygons, and smoothed curves.
- Recall guidelines for
constructing histograms, frequency polygons, and smooth curves.
- Discriminate among
positively skewed, symmetrical, and negatively skewed distributions.
- Determine the mean,
median, and mode, given a set of data.
- Explain why the mean
is influenced by extreme scores.
- Locate correctly the
relative positions of the measures of central tendency in various
distributions represented by smooth curves.
- Identify the measure
of central tendency that best represents the data in various distributions.
- Explain why the mode
is the least stable measure of central tendency.
- Draw conclusions about
data based on the measures of central tendency and/or smooth curves based on
the data.
CHAPTER 13
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe what
variability means.
- Determine the range,
semi-interquartile range, and standard deviation for a given set of data.
- Compare and contrast
the range, semi-interquartile range, and standard deviation.
- Determine quartiles
and percentiles for a given set of data.
- Explain why the normal
distribution is useful for statistical decision-making.
- Recall the approximate
percentages of cases falling between standard deviation units in the normal
curve.
- Determine the
percentage of cases falling above, below or between given scores in a
distribution, when the distribution is assumed to approach normality.
- Discriminate between
raw and converted scores.
- Use z-scores
conversions to facilitate comparisons of scores from different
distributions.
- Determine equivalent
raw scores, z-scores, T-scores, and percentile ranks.
- Use the measures of
central tendency, variability, converted scores, and the properties of the
normal curve to make decisions about measurement data, both for the
individual students and for groups.
CHAPTER 14
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Interpret correlation
coefficients as to strength and direction.
- Explain verbally what
a correlation between two distribution means.
- Interpret scatterplots
as to strength, direction, and meaning.
- Describe why the
presence of even a very strong correlation does not imply causality.
- Compare and contrast
the correlation coefficient and the coefficient of determination.
- Describe a curvilinear
relationship.
- Recognize a
scatterplot depicting a curvilinear relationship.
- Explain what the term
“truncated range” means.
- Explain why
correlation coefficients compared from a truncated range of data will be
weaker than if computed from the entire range of data.
CHAPTER 15
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Discriminate between
examples of valid and invalid tests.
- Compare and contrast
content validity evidence, concurrent validity evidence, and predictive
validity evidence.
- Describe procedures
used to establish content validity evidence for a particular use of a test.
- Identify the
limitations of content validity evidence in appraising a test’s overall
validity.
- Describe procedures
used to establish concurrent validity evidence for a particular use of a
test.
- Describe procedures
used to establish the predictive validity evidence for a particular use of a
test.
- Describe procedures
used to establish the construct validity evidence for a particular use of a
test.
- Identify the type of
validity evidence most important for achievement tests.
- Recall the principles
to be employed in interpreting validity coefficients.
- Explain how group
heterogeneity affects the size of a validity coefficient.
- Select the most valid
test for a given purpose when given different types of validity information.
- Identify the most
appropriate type of validity evidence, when given different purposes for
testing.
CHAPTER 16
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Compare and contrast
reliability and validity.
- Define the different
methods of estimating reliability.
- Describe procedures
used to estimate test-retest reliability.
- Describe procedures
used to estimate alternate-forms reliability.
- Identify situations in
which test-retest or alternate-forms reliability is most appropriate.
- Describe procedures
used to estimate split-half and Kuder-Richardson estimates of internal
consistency.
- Describe how the
Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formula is used, and its effect on the reliability
coefficient.
- Define and
discriminate between power and speeded tests.
- Recall principles to
be employed in interpreting reliability coefficients.
- Explain why group
heterogeneity affects reliability coefficients.
- Explain why longer
tests tend to be more reliable than shorter tests.
- Explain why different
estimates of reliability will yield different reliability coefficients for
the same test.
- Select one best test
for a given purpose when given reliability and validity information for
several tests.
- Identify the most
appropriate type of reliability when given different purposes for testing.
CHAPTER 17
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Define accuracy as
applied to test scores.
- Define and give
examples of error in testing.
- Explain how error can
operate to both increase and decrease test scores.
- Define and
discriminate among obtained, true and error scores.
- Describe the error
score distribution.
- Explain why the
standard deviation of the error scores is important in test interpretation.
- Discriminate between
the standard deviation and standard error of measurement.
- Employ the standard
error in interpreting test scores, when provided with test data.
- Compute the standard
error when given data about a test’s standard deviation and reliability.
- Construction 68, 95,
and 99% confidence bands around obtained scores when given the standard
error.
- Explain why the
standard error should always be used in interpreting test scores.
- Identify the four
scores of error in testing, and give examples of each.
- Describe the extent to
which the various estimates of reliability are differentially affected by
the sources of error.
CHAPTER 18
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe why
standardized tests are called “standardized”
- State the purpose(s)
of standardized tests.
- Describe “high stakes”
educational decisions.
- Describe the effects
of accommodations on standardized tests.
- Explain why the use of
accommodations and alternative assessments may compromise the utility of
standardized assessment of the progress of special education students in the
general education curriculum.
- Explain why
standardized testing will continue even if performance and portfolio bases
assessment becomes more prevalent.
- Identify two
impediments to the widespread adoption of performance and portfolio based
assessments.
- Identify the types of
comparisons made possible by standardized tests.
- Identify uses and
misuses of standardized tests.
- Compare and contrast
standardized and teacher-made tests.
- Indicate the sources
of error controlled or minimized by standardized tests.
- Describe the effects
of controlling or minimizing error through standardized tests.
- Recall test-related
factors that must be considered in interpreting standardized test results.
- Identify acceptable
reliability coefficients for standardized achievement tests.
- Explain why close
correspondence between the make-up of the norm group and the make-up of your
class is important.
- Develop a local norms
table given a set of test scores.
- Identify the
student-related factors that must be considered in interpreting standardized
test scores.
- Describe how each of
these factors can affect standardized test scores.
- Discriminate among the
terms underachiever, overachiever, and achievement at expectancy.
- Discriminate between
aptitude and achievement tests.
- Describe what is meant
by aptitude-achievement tests.
- Identify
aptitude-achievement test scores for a group of students.
- Convert grade
equivalents and percentile ranks to standard scores (using a supplied
conversion table) to facilitate determining aptitude-achievement
discrepancies.
- Compare and contrast
grade equivalent scores, age equivalent scores, percentile ranks, and
standard scores.
- Describe how grade and
age equivalent scores are obtained.
- List the advantages
and disadvantages of grade equivalents, age equivalents, percentile ranks,
and standard scores.
- Explain how stanines
differ from other scores.
- Recall the major
interpretative cautions identified by the author in using converted scores.
- Interpret individual
score reports, considering test- and student-related factors.
- Explain why it is
useful for publishers to include percentile bands for each subtest on
individual score reports.
CHAPTER 19
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Discriminate among
standardized achievement test batteries, single subject achievement tests,
and diagnostic achievement tests.
- Recognize the names of
commonly used survey batteries and single subject achievement tests.
- Describe the purpose
of diagnostic achievement tests.
- Compare and contrast
diagnostic tests and survey batteries.
- Discriminate between
aptitude and achievement tests.
- Explain why the
authors are reluctant to call IQ tests intelligence tests.
- Indicate how the
stability of IQ scores change for different ages and across different time
spans.
- Describe the
relationship between IQ scores and academic achievement and between IQ
scores and job success.
- Recognize the name of
commonly administered individual and group IQ tests.
- Explain why there is
no universally accepted definition of personality.
- Compare and contrast
objective and projective personality assessment techniques and identify the
major advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
- Identify and describe
the steps involved in planning and implementing a district-wide testing
program.
- Define “redundancy”
and “continuity”, as these terms apply to a district-wide testing program.
- Identify the scores of
information regarding standardized tests and advantages and disadvantages of
each of these sources.
CHAPTER 20
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Describe the major
intentions of the US Congress in passing the 1997 Amendments to the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA-97).
- Describe the
implications for general education teachers of IDEA-97.
- Describe the
implications of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act for general education
teachers.
- Describe the service
delivery setting evolution that has taken place in special education.
- Describe the evolution
that has occurred in determining eligibility for special education services.
- Distinguish between
the terms of disability category and developmental delay.
- Explain why the
addition of the term “developmental delay” has important implications for
general education teachers.
- Distinguish between
testing and the process of assessment.
- Define Full Inclusion.
- Identify the
implications of Full Inclusion on the regular classroom teacher.
- Describe what is meant
by the “least restrictive educational alternative.”
- Recognize the
definitions associated with various disability conditions according to
IDEA-97.
- Identify the types of
assessment data the classroom teacher may be called upon to provide as part
of the child identification process.
- Recall the types of
assessment instruments the classroom teacher may be called upon to present
as part of the individual assessment process.
- Identify the types of
assessment instruments the classroom teacher may employ during the
individual assessment process.
- Describe what is
typically included in an individual educational plan (IEP).
- Explain the classroom
teacher’s role in IEP development and its implementation.
- Describe the
instructional activities the classroom teacher may be called upon to provide
as part of the process of individualized instruction.
- State the purpose of
the IEP review and why the data collected by the classroom teacher are
critical to the IEP review process.
- Identify the intention
of a manifestation determination.
- Explain why the term
“Talented and Gifted” has come to replace “Gifted” or “Intellectually
Gifted” to describe those individuals at the opposite end of the
distribution from those individuals protected by IDEA-97 and 99-457.
- Define and describe
intelligence achievement, creativity, and task persistence.
CHAPTER 21
Learning Outcomes
The student will be able
to:
- Explain why the
instruction and evaluation of children with disabilities will increasingly
take place within the regular education classroom.
- Explain why
assessments of children with disabilities performed by special educators
increasingly will need to be supplemented or replaced by assessments
performed by regular educators.
- Explain why regular
educators will play key roles in the development and evaluation of behavior
plans for children with disabilities.
- Recognize the ways
assessment tools used to assess regular learners can, with modification, be
used to help assess children with disabilities in the regular classroom.
- Describe the role of
the teacher-made and standardized tests and assessments in evaluating
children with disabilities in the regular education curriculum.
- Recognize the
limitations of accommodations and alternative assessments for annual state-
and district-wide assessments.
- Identify methods the
classroom teacher may use to collect data to assist in implementing and
evaluating behavior plans for children with disabilities.
- Explain how attitude
assessment may enhance acceptance and achievement of children with
disabilities in the regular classroom.
- Distinguish between
attitude and behavior.
- Compare and contrast
unstructured and structured observation methods to assess attitudes and
behavior.
- Construct a structured
observation checklist.
- Construct and
interpret a sociogram.
- Compare and contrast
Likert and two-point scales.
- Develop Likert and
two-point scales, according to the guidelines presented.
- Score Likert and
two-point scales.
- Recall suggestions for
writing attitude statements.
- Identify faults in
poorly written attitude statements.
- Develop a bipolar
adjective scale.
- Score a bipolar
adjective scale.